Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread

Oppong et al., J Plant Physiol Pathol 2021, 9:8Β 

Journal of PlantΒ Β 

Physiology & PathologyΒ 

Research Article A SciTechnol JournalΒ 

Cassava Mosaic Virus DiseaseΒ  in Ghana: Distribution andΒ  SpreadΒ 

Allen Oppong1*. Ruth Naa A. Prempeh1, Linda AppianimaaΒ  Abrokwah1, Esther Afoley Annang1, Esther Agyeman Marfo1,Β  Zipporah Appiah Kubi1, Nana A. O. Danquah1, AugustineΒ  Agyekum1, Benedicta Nsiah Frimpong1, Andrews SarkodieΒ  Appiah3, Joseph N.L. Lamptey1, Moses Brandford Mochiah1,Β  Justin S. Pita2Β 

AbstractΒ 

Cassava is an important staple crop in most of the tropics, includingΒ  Ghana. The productivity of the crop is beset with pest and diseaseΒ  attacks. With the emergence of virulent strains of the cassavaΒ  mosaic virus (CMV), regular surveys are necessary to ascertain theΒ  prevalence of CMV and their whitefy vectors in farmers’ felds toΒ  help manage CMV disease affecting the crop. Field surveys wereΒ  conducted in September and October of 2015 and December 2016Β  to January 2017 using a harmonized sampling protocol developedΒ  by the West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE) for root andΒ  tuber projects. Three hundred and ninety-three felds were visitedΒ  throughout Ghana and 11,760 cassava leaf samples examined.Β  Whitefies were counted on 5 plants/feld. Diseased samples withΒ  varying symptoms collected were assayed using PCR and genomicΒ  sequencing. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD) symptoms wereΒ  recorded in about ninety-six percent (96.4%) of felds surveyedΒ  with varying severity. These symptoms included leaf mosaic, leafΒ  distortion/twisting, malformation, fliform leaves, stunting andΒ  chlorosis. Cultivars with red petiole colour were the most prevalentΒ  while those with green petiole colour were the least. No whitefy wasΒ  found on cultivars with purple and Green petioles while cultivarsΒ  with reddish-green petioles had highest count of whitefies/plant.Β  The Upper West and Upper East regions had the least amountΒ  of whitefies/plant. The Ghanaian isolates clustered with the EastΒ  African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus (EACMCV) isolates in aΒ  cluster analysis. BLASTn analysis of 513 bp fragment of the DNA-B ofΒ  Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 89.9% similarity with EACMCV Ghana isolates and 90.54% identity with the EACMCV-Ivory Coast.Β  Similarly, the Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 95.8% nucleotideΒ  sequence identity to the EACMCV-Ghana isolate and 94.22% toΒ  the EACMV-Ivory Coast isolate. Nucleotide sequences of DNA-A ofΒ  the Ghanaian isolates were less variable: between 95.90-96.73%Β  when compared to already published sequences to a range of CMGΒ  sequences available on the GenBank. The study has updated theΒ  existing literature on CMD incidence which can contribute to theΒ  development CMD-resistant cassava varieties in Ghana.Β Β 

Keywords: Manihot esculenta; EACMV-Ivory coastΒ Β 

*Corresponding author: Allen Oppong, CSIR-Crops Research Institute, Kumasi,Β  E-mail: alnopp@yahoo.co.ukΒ Β 

Received: June 29, 2021 Accepted: July 10, 2021 Published: July 17, 2021Β 

IntroductionΒ 

Cassava is the number one root and tuber crop in Ghana (FigureΒ  1). Te crop is cultivated predominantly in the southern and centralΒ  parts of Ghana with signifcant production in the middle and northernΒ  parts of the country. Te only areas of the country which do not haveΒ  signifcant production of cassava are the Sudan savannah areas aroundΒ  the Upper East and North East regions (Figure 1). Te estimated totalΒ  land under cassava production is estimated around 900,000 hectares.Β  In Ghana, over 70% of farmers engage in cassava production, and theΒ  sector contributes about 22% of Agricultural GDP [1]. Ghana ranksΒ  among the top fve cassava producers in Africa with an annual averageΒ  production of sixteen million metric tons [1].Β 

Its cultivation and associated businesses along the value chain isΒ  a major source of employment for millions of the population. It isΒ  a staple food crop in areas where it is cultivated and it is processedΒ  into several industrial products such as cassava starch, cassava beer,Β  spray starch, pharmaceutical raw material among several others [2].Β  In recent times cassava has become an important crop to the socioΒ 

cultural life and the economy of Ghana. However, the production ofΒ  this crop faces several challenges. Tese include dependence on lowΒ  yielding varieties, poor agronomic practices on the part of farmersΒ  and incidence of pests and diseases [3]. Tere are several pests andΒ  diseases that afect cassava production, but Cassava Mosaic DiseaseΒ  (CMD) constitutes the most endemic disease of the crop in GhanaΒ  [4]. Te disease can cause yield losses of over 90% depending on timeΒ  of infection and the variety [5,6]. Te disease was frst reported in theΒ  country a century ago by Warburg (1894) who described it as β€˜leafΒ  curl’ or β€˜crinkle’ illness aficting cassava plants” [7, 8]. Several strainsΒ  of the cassava mosaic virus, the causal agent of CMD, have beenΒ  reported in Ghana and in other parts of Africa and have been shownΒ  to be responsible for severe yield losses [9-15].Β Β 

To ascertain the current distribution of CMD and the strainΒ  diversity of the virus in Ghana it is important that periodic surveysΒ  and feld monitoring are conducted. Tis approach can help developΒ  strategies which can curtail the potential damage that new and moreΒ  virulent strains of the virus could cause to cassava production in theΒ  country and beyond.Β Β 

To this end, two nationwide surveys were conducted to provideΒ  baseline data that can be used by breeders and other stakeholders,Β  including modelers, to identify disease hotspot and cold spots forΒ  breeding resistant varieties and the multiplication of disease-freeΒ  planting materials for farmers. Additionally, this would provide dataΒ  for predicting the rate of spread of cassava mosaic virus in Ghana andΒ  West Africa.Β Β 

Materials and MethodsΒ 

Field surveyΒ 

Surveys were conducted throughout the regions indicated inΒ  (Figure 1). Tey were carried out in September and October of 2015Β  and December 2016 to January 2017, using a harmonized samplingΒ  protocol developed by the West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE)Β  for root and tuber project head quartered at the University of FΓ©lixΒ  HouphouΓ«t-Boigny, Abidjan, CΓ΄te d’Ivoire. During each survey,Β 

All articles published in Journal of Plant Physiology & Pathology are the property of SciTechnol, and is protected by copyrightΒ  laws. Copyright Β© 2021, SciTechnol, All Rights Reserved. International Publisher of Science, Β 

Technology and MedicineΒ 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

Figure 1: Map of Ghana showing regional boundaries and the agro-ecologies.

coordinates of felds visited were captured using a GPS device. TeΒ  minimum distance between two felds where samples were collectedΒ  was 10 km and in areas where cassava production was sparse,Β  the distance between two felds varied depending on minimumΒ  distances felds were encountered. In each feld transect walksΒ  along two diagonals were made, and disease incidence and severityΒ  were assessed on 15 plants within each transect. Tus, a total of 30Β  plants were assessed in each feld for disease incidence and severity.Β  Disease incidence was measured as a percentage of number of plantsΒ  infected per feld based on the sampled plants while disease severityΒ  was assessed based on a scale ranging from 1 to 5 as defned by theΒ  International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Using thisΒ  scale, 1 represents absence of infection; 2: mild infection; 3: moderateΒ  infection; 4: severe infection and 5 represents very severe infectionΒ  [16]. Data were collected via an electronic device programmed by theΒ  University of Cambridge, UK. Te data were then uploaded into aΒ  central repository at the University of Cambridge, UK for analysis.Β  From each feld, leaf samples showing symptoms of cassava mosaicΒ  virus infection were collected from among the top 5 leaves; these wereΒ  kept in herbarium pressers and labeled. In addition, stem cuttingsΒ  of infected plants were also collected and labeled. Te leaf samplesΒ  were stored at the laboratory under ambient conditions while theΒ  stem cuttings were maintained in insect proof screenhouse prior toΒ  laboratory analysis. Whitefy Bemisia tabaci vectors were collectedΒ  using an aspirator from 5 plants/feld and the total number countedΒ  and recorded. Te whitefies were preserved in 70% ethanol, labeledΒ  and stored at the laboratory in a freezer at 4Β°C. Te diversity of cassavaΒ  genotypes encountered on the felds were diferentiated using the leafΒ  petiole colour as most of the farm owners could not readily give theΒ  names of the varieties they had planted.Β 

Laboratory diagnosticsΒ Β 

Genomic DNA was extracted from samples based on CetylΒ  Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method [17].Β Β 

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)Β 

PCR was carried out in a 25 Β΅l reaction consisting of the followingΒ Β 

reagents: PCR-grade water; 5 Β΅l of 5x standard bufer; 2.5 Β΅l 5%Β  Tween-20; 0.25 Β΅l of 10 mM dNTPs; 0.25 Β΅l each of Forward andΒ  Reverse primers; 5 U Taq polymerase and 5 Β΅l of DNA template.Β  (Table 1) contains the list of primers used for the analysis andΒ  detection of virus strains.Β 

Termocycling conditionsΒ 

Amplification conditions included a first PCR cycle comprisingΒ  denaturation at 94Β°C for 5 min, annealing of primers at 52Β°C for 1Β  min and elongation at 72Β°C for 2 min. Tis initial amplification cycleΒ  was followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94Β°C, 1 min at 52Β°C and 2 min atΒ  72Β°C. At the end of the reaction, a final elongation step was achievedΒ  at 72Β°C for 10 min and the reaction held at 4Β°C.Β Β 

PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5%Β  agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (1 lg⁄10 ml) under a constantΒ  current of 100 V. Visualization of the amplified bands under UV lightΒ  was done using a Vilber Lourmat (InfnityTM) gel documentationΒ  imaging system.Β 

SequencingΒ 

Where the expected bands on the agarose gel were not at exactlyΒ  at the position according to the primer base pair, the recovered PCRΒ  products were prepared for sequencing. Sequencing was carried outΒ  by GENEWIZ, Inc (South Plainfeld, NJ) using Applied BiosystemsΒ  Big Dye version 3.1. Te reactions were then run through an AppliedΒ  Biosystem 3730xl DNA Analyzer for DNA sequencing.Β 

Data analysisΒ 

For our analysis, we made use of data-analysis sofware, namelyΒ  a multi-dimensional data cube referred to, within the WAVEΒ  programme as Scriptoria (2021); as the WAVE Cube. Tis toolΒ  enabled us to interrogate and view our survey data from diferentΒ  perspectives to present our extracted results as tables and graphics.Β 

Sequence analysisΒ 

Te sequence data was analysed by frst checking theΒ Β 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 2 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

Table 1: Primers used in this study to amplify DNA from cassava samples collected during disease survey.Β 

Primer NameΒ  Sequences (5’ to 3’)Β  Virus SpeciesΒ  Product Size (bp)
JSP001F/Β 

JSP002R

ATGTCGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ 

TGTTTATTAATTGCCAATACT

ACMVΒ  Μ΄ 770
JSP001FΒ  ATGTCGGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ  EACMVΒ  Μ΄ 770
JSP003RΒ  CCTTTATTAATTTGTCACTGCΒ  EACMV
CMBRep/FΒ  CRTCAATGACGTTGTACCAΒ  ACMVΒ  368
ACMVRep/RΒ  CAGCGGMAGTAAGTCMGAΒ  ACMV
CMBCP/FΒ  GKCGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ  ACMVΒ  650
ACMVCP/RΒ  CCCTGYCTCCTGATGATTATAΒ  ACMV
ACMV-AL1/FΒ  GCGGAATCCCTAACATTATCΒ  ACMVΒ  1000
ACMV-ARO/RΒ  GCTCGTATGTATCCTCTAAGGCCTGΒ  ACMV
UV-AL1/F1Β  TGTCTTCTGGGACTTGTGTGΒ  EACMVΒ  1600
UV-AL1/R1Β  AACCTATCCCCGATGCTCATΒ  EACMV
UV-AL1/F2Β  GTAATTGGGAAAGGGCCTCTΒ  EACMVΒ  1000
UV-CP/RΒ  GTTACGGAGCAACATGCAATΒ  EACMV
UV-AL1/F1Β  TGTCTTCTGGGACTTGTGTGΒ  EACMV-UGΒ  1600
ACMV-CP/R3Β  TGCCTCCTGATGATTATATGTCΒ  EACMV-UG
CMBCP/FΒ  GKCGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ  EACMV-UGΒ  1000
EACMV-UG/RΒ  CGCCTAAGCAAGGAATGGCGTΒ  EACMV-UG
ACMVB1FΒ  TCGGGAGTGATACATGCGAAGGCΒ  ACMV 628Β 
ACMVB2RΒ  GGCTACACCAGCTACCTGAAGCTΒ  ACMV
VNF031/FΒ  GGATACAGATAGGGTTCCCACΒ  EACMVΒ  β‰ˆ 560
VNF032/RΒ  GACGAGGACAAGAATTCCAATΒ  EACMV
EAB555/FΒ  TACATCGGCCTTTGAGTCGCATGGΒ  EACMVΒ  544-560
EAB555/RΒ  CTTATTAACGCCTATATAAACACCΒ  EACMV

Β 

chromatograms manually to avoid base miscalls and then trimmedΒ  of low-quality sequences at the 5β€² and 3β€² ends. Te forward andΒ  reverse sequences were compared to ensure complete homology.Β  Te sequences were then edited, aligned and compared with otherΒ  published isolates using Geneious 8.0 (Biomatters), ClustalW [18]Β  BLAST [19]. Te nucleotide sequences derived from each of the CMGΒ  isolates from Ghana were used in BLASTn analysis to ascertain theirΒ  identity to the published isolates deposited at the NCBI database.Β  Cluster dendrograms were generated with the Geneious Tree BuilderΒ  using the Neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap support.Β 

ResultsΒ 

Field surveyΒ 

Tree hundred and ninety-three (393) cassava farms wereΒ  surveyed (215 in 2015 and 178 in 2016/17); in total 11,790 plants wereΒ  examined across the country. Over ninety-six percent (96.44%) ofΒ  all felds surveyed were diagnosed with CMD (Table 2) showing theΒ  endemic nature of CMD in Ghana.Β Β 

Northern region had the highest incidence of CMD followed byΒ  Brong-Ahafo and the Upper West regions respectively (Figure 2)Β  while Greater Accra had the highest CMD severity followed by UpperΒ  West, Ashanti, Eastern, Western and then Brong-Ahafo regionsΒ  (Figures 3-5).Β 

CMD Symptoms regularly encountered include leaf mosaic,Β  leaf distortion/twisting, malformation, fliform leaves and stuntingΒ  (Figure 6).Β 

Fields with 50% to 75% disease incidence had the highest numberΒ  of whitefy populations while those with disease incidence greaterΒ  than 75% had the least whitefy population (Figure 7). Ashanti regionΒ  had the highest whitefy population/plant followed by Central and theΒ Β 

Table 2: Percentage of cassava felds showing CMD-infected and non-infected.Β 

Year of SurveyΒ  CMD-Infected Fields %Β  Healthy Fields %
2015 (Year 1)Β  95.35%Β  4.65%
2016/17 (Year 2)Β  97.75%Β  2.25%
Grand TotalΒ  96.44%Β  3.56%

 

Table 3: Mean Whitefy population count per plant across the regions during theΒ  2-year survey period.

RegionΒ  Whitefy – Mean population/plant
AshantiΒ  2.11
Brong-AhafoΒ  0.85
CentralΒ  1.38
EasternΒ  0.85
Greater AccraΒ  0.72
NorthernΒ  0.12
Upper EastΒ  0.05
Upper WestΒ  0.07
VoltaΒ  0.75
WesternΒ  1.66
MeanΒ  1.03

 

Western regions respectively (Table 3).Β 

Dominant varieties encountered were cultivars with red petiolesΒ  followed by those with yellowish green petiole (Table 4 and Figure 6).Β  However, farmers could not identify the varieties by their actual namesΒ  and most of them classifed the plants as local varieties. Varieties withΒ  yellowish green petioles had the highest disease severity, followedΒ  by varieties with red petioles while plants with yellowish greenΒ  petioles with pinkish colouration had the lowest severity (Table 4).Β  No whitefies were collected on plants with purple and green petiolesΒ  encountered during the feld surveys (Table 4).Β 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 3 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

Laboratory diagnosticsΒ 

Figure 2: Percentage mean incidence of CMD across the regions surveyed in 2015 and 2016/17.Β 

Figure 3: Mean severity of CMD disease across the regions during the 2015 and 2016/17 surveys.Β 

Figure 4: Map showing the incidence (A) and severity (B) of CMD in Ghana for 2015.

sequences available on the NCBI. Te Ghanaian isolates clusteredΒ Β 

Afer trimming, sequences of 513 nt of CMG DNA-B of theΒ  Ghanaian isolates were compared to a range of CMG DNA-BΒ Β 

with full genomes of the East African cassava mosaic CameroonΒ  virus (EACMCV) isolates as indicated in the cluster dendrogramΒ  illustrated in (Figures 8 and 9) indicating the sequenced nucleotidesΒ Β 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 4 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

Figure 5: Map showing CMD severity (A) and incidence (B) of areas surveyed in 2016/17.Β 

Figure 6: CMD symptoms on infected plants encountered during the survey. The arrows point to A: Leaf mosaic/distortion, B:Β  Filiforms and C: Stunting/leaf mosaic/distortion and some of leaf petiole colours observed.Β 

Figure 7: Mean CMD percentage incidence and mean whitefy number in felds surveyed over the two-year period.Β 

from our samples although complete shared close resemblance.Β  BLASTn analysis of 513 bp fragment of the DNA-B of GhanaianΒ  isolate GH07216 showed 89.9% similarity with EACMCV-GhanaΒ  isolate (Accession no, JN165087.1) and 90.54% identity with theΒ  EACMCV-Ivory Coast (Accession no, AF259897.1) (Figure 8).Β Β 

Similarly, Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 95.8% nucleotideΒ  sequence identity to the EACMCV-Ghana isolate and 94.22% to theΒ  Ivory Coast isolate. Nucleotide sequences of DNA-A of the GhanaianΒ  isolates were less variable when compared to already publishedΒ  sequences available on the GenBank. BLAST analysis of a 747 bpΒ 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 5 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

Table 4: Cultivar petiole colour, CMD severity and whitefy population count per plant observed during the survey period.Β 

Cultivar type (Petiole colour)Β  No. of samplesΒ  CMD Severity MeanΒ  Whitefy countΒ  Whitefy count/plant
Reddish greenΒ  30Β  2.67Β  29.00 (0.5392)Β  0.86
Pinkish petioleΒ  330Β  2.82Β  15.00 (0.0084)Β  0.04
Purple petioleΒ  30Β  2.33Β  0.00 (0.0000)Β  0
Red petioleΒ  8,250Β  2.98Β  1,974.00 (0.0398)Β  0.34
Yellowish green petioleΒ  3,030Β  2.99Β  729.00 (0.0523)Β  0.24
Greenish red PetioleΒ  30Β  2.00Β  6.00 (0.1390)Β  0.2
Green petioleΒ  60Β  2.78Β  0.00 (0.0000)Β  0
TotalΒ  11,760Β  2.98Β  2,753.00 (0.0266)
*Numbers in brackets are standard error of mean (SEM) values

 

Figure 8: Dendrogram showing clustering of samples with similar DNA-A nucleotide patterns, this clustering was producedΒ  using Geneious Tree Builder using the Neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap support. The Ghanaian isolate clusteredΒ  together with 84.4% similarity to ACMV isolates including ACMV KE and ACMV Ghana isolates.

fragment of isolate Gh14916 revealed nucleotide sequence identity ofΒ  between 95.90-96.73 % to a range of CMG sequences available on theΒ  GenBank (Figure 9).Β 

DiscussionΒ 

Te fndings of this survey on the incidence and spread of CMDΒ  are similar to those reported by [20,21] although their surveys wereΒ  limited to certain parts of Ghana. Te inclusion of the northern partsΒ  of the country in our current surveys is relevant. Similar surveys doneΒ  in the past have ofen focused mainly on the southern parts [21]. In theΒ  most recent survey of the country carried out by [21] in 2007 and 2008,Β  they reported the widespread incidence of CMD in mainly southernΒ  and central parts of Ghana and they surveyed only 136 farmers’ felds,Β  but our work has gone beyond these geographical areas and numbers.Β Β 

Te current study represents a large increase in the number of feldsΒ  surveyed in recent times and gives a better picture of the extent ofΒ  spread of CMD in Ghana. Tis result also gives indication as to theΒ  levels of productivity lost by farmers, assuming a 10% yield reductionΒ  to CMD infection on farmer felds. Tis fnding requires that urgentΒ  steps be taken to fnd a robust remedy to reduce the incidence ofΒ  CMD in farmers’ felds to improve cassava productivity and ensureΒ  food security because cassava alone contributes about 22% of Ghana’sΒ  agricultural GDP.Β 

Te CMD symptoms observed is consistent with CMD symptomsΒ  reported by several authors including all [20-22].Β Β 

Te low incidence of whitefies on plants showing very highΒ  incidence of CMD (75% to 100%) suggests that the highly infectedΒ Β 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 6 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

Figure 9: Dendrogram showing clustering of samples with similar DNA-B nucleotide patterns. this clustering was producedΒ  using Geneious Tree Builder using the Neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap support Four of the Ghanaian isolatesΒ  clustered with EACMVCV-Ivory Coast isolate and others

felds become unattractive to the insects and therefore the insectsΒ  move on to felds that are fresher and healthier or possibly youngerΒ  [23]. Te studies by them [24] have reported that the diseaseΒ  incidence on felds planted with infected cuttings and the relativeΒ  abundance of whitefies contribute diferently to the incidence of theΒ  disease. Analysis of symptoms observed on infected plants and feldsΒ  during our survey indicated that infections could be from infectedΒ  cuttings used as planting materials as well as from whitefies. TeseΒ  two sources have been established as key sources of infections and itΒ  is believed that both infected cuttings and whitefies afected diseaseΒ  incidence and severity in the felds surveyed [25].Β Β 

Generally, the whitefy populations encountered in the feldsΒ  were low and varied among the regions; this is similar to fndingsΒ  by [26] in Congo Brazzaville and [27] in Ghana. Te northernΒ  parts of Ghana which have a savannah agro-ecology with unimodalΒ  rainfall had the lowest incidence of whitefies which is similar toΒ  observations reported. Te northern parts of Ghana can be proposedΒ  for the establishment and maintenance of clean planting materialsΒ  production felds. Tis is because with low incidence of whitefies itΒ  is expected that felds planted with disease-free cuttings can maintainΒ  their health status for some time before they become infected.Β 

Laboratory diagnosticsΒ 

Te detection of various strains of ACMV and EACMCV isolatesΒ  based on the analysis of CMV DNA-A and DNA-B nucleotides showsΒ  the widespread nature of CMVs in Ghana. Previous reports hadΒ  detected ACMV-Ghana isolate and EACMV-Cameroun and others.Β Β 

However, the detection of ACMV isolate with 84.4% similarity toΒ  ACMV-Kenya isolate and EACMVCV Ivory Coast isolate in theΒ  present study for instance is a clear indication that more strains ofΒ  CMV could be present already in Ghana or new strains of CMVΒ  could be entering the country. It is therefore important that regularΒ  monitoring and surveillance are conducted to identify any potentialΒ  new strains to assist the management of CMD, including breedingΒ  for robust CMV-resistant cultivars thereby improving cassavaΒ  productivity. Te possible detection of new strains from regularΒ  monitoring and surveillance can also help modelers to predict theΒ  spread of new strains of CMV and other cassava viruses in the countryΒ  and possibly in the West African sub region.Β 

ConclusionΒ 

While this study has not included a study of the evolutionaryΒ  aspects of any of the cassava viruses, it has shown an increase fromΒ  previous surveys in the number of viruses detected in Ghana. InΒ  particular, the presence of ACMV-Kenya and EACMV-Ivory CoastΒ  had not been evident previously in Ghana this is therefore a newΒ  fnding for this country.Β 

Te study has shown the spread and distribution of CMD inΒ  Ghana. Disease symptoms regularly encountered in farmers feldΒ  included leaf mosaic, leaf distortion/twisting, malformation, fliformΒ  leaves, stunting and chlorosis. Cultivars with red petiole colourΒ  were the most prevalent while those with green petiole colour wereΒ  the least. No whitefy was found on cultivars with purple and greenΒ  petioles while cultivars with reddish-green petioles had highest countΒ Β 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 7 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

of whitefies/plant. Te Upper West and Upper East regions hadΒ  the least number of whitefies/plant and could be good locations forΒ  healthy planting material production. Te Ghanaian isolates clusteredΒ  with the East African Cassava Mosaic Cameroon Virus (EACMCV)Β  isolates. BLAST analysis of 513 bp fragment of the DNA-B ofΒ  Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 89.9% similarity with EACMCVΒ 

Ghana isolates and 90.54% identity with the EACMCV-Ivory Coast.Β  Similarly, Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 95.8% nucleotideΒ  sequence identity to the EACMCV-Ghana isolate and 94.22% to theΒ  Ivory Coast isolate. Nucleotide sequences of DNA-A of the GhanaianΒ  isolates were less variable; between 95.90 – 96.73 % when compared toΒ  already published sequences to a range of CMG sequences availableΒ  on the GenBank. Locations with high CMD incidence and severityΒ  were identifed which are good and can be proposed for breedingΒ  of CMD resistant cassava cultivars in the country. Te informationΒ  contained in this paper will provide a useful guide for Scientists andΒ  other researchers and Extension worker engaged in cassava researchΒ  and improvement of farmer productivity. Using the methodologyΒ  shown in this study, we conclude that the possible detection of newΒ  strains from regular monitoring and surveillance could help modelersΒ  to predict entrance of new strains of CMV and other cassava virusesΒ  in the country and possibly in the West African sub region.Β 

Declaration SectionΒ 

Ethics approval and consent to participateΒ 

Not applicableΒ 

Consent of PublicationΒ 

Not applicableΒ 

Availability of Data and MaterialΒ 

Field and laboratory data are stored at the repository of ScriptoriaΒ  Agshare,Today, UK and is readily available to interested parties.Β Β 

Competing InterestsΒ 

Te authors declare that β€œthey have no competing interests”. FundingΒ 

Tis work was funded by the Gates Foundation and UKΒ  Department for International Development (DFID) throughΒ  University of FΓ©lix HouphouΓ«t-Boigny and the WAVE projectΒ  (OPP1082413).Β 

Author’s ContributionsΒ 

Allen Oppong: Lead investigator and lead author of this article.Β 

Ruth N.A Prempeh, Linda A. Abrokwah, Supported data entry,Β  laboratory analysis and writing of article.Β 

Esther Afoley Annang, Esther Agyeman Marfo, Zipporah AppiahΒ  Kubi, Supported laboratory analysis and proof reading of article.Β 

Nana A.O. Danquah Supported in laboratory analysis. Augustine Agyekum Assisted in feld survey and collection of data. Andrews Sarkodie Appiah Assisted in phylogenetic analysis.Β 

Benedicta Nsiah Frimpong, Joseph N.L. Lamptey, MosesΒ  Brandford Mochiah, Assisted in manuscript review.Β 

Justin S. Pita Conceptualization of project idea and mainΒ  recipient of project grant; review of manuscript.Β 

AcknowledgementΒ 

The authors are very grateful frstly to the Gates Foundation and UKΒ  Department for International Development (DFID) through University of FΓ©lixΒ  HouphouΓ«t-Boigny and the WAVE project (OPP1082413) for providing funds forΒ  this work. The authors are also grateful to the various Agric Extension OffcersΒ  who assisted during the feld surveys. The drivers, Technicians and staff of CSIRΒ 

Crops Research Institute who played various roles during the survey are deeplyΒ  appreciated. Finally, we thank the Scriptoria AgShare. Today programme and theΒ  University of Cambridge, UK for the editorial and technical support respectively.Β 

β€œThis work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda GatesΒ  Foundation [OPP1082413]. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, aΒ  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assignedΒ  to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.” 

ReferencesΒ 

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipmon DJ (1990) Basic localΒ  alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403410.Β 
  2. Bisimwa E, Walangululu J, Bragard C (2015) Cassava Mosaic Disease YieldΒ  Loss Assessment under Various Altitude Agroecosystems in the SudKivuΒ  Region, Democratic Republic of Congo. Tropicultura 33: 101110.Β 
  3. Bock KR (1983) Epidemiology of cassava mosaic disease in Kenya. In:Β  Plumb RT, Thresh JM, ed. Plant Virus Epidemiology. The Spread andΒ  Control of Insect-borne Viruses. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell ScientifcΒ  Publications, 337-347.Β 
  4. Bull SE, Briddon RW, Sserubombwe WS, Ngugi K, Markham PG, et al.Β  (2006) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of cassava mosaic viruses inΒ  Kenya. J Gen Virol 87: 3053-3065.Β 
  5. Cudjoe A, Gyamenah J, Braima J (2005) Chapter 1.2 (Ghana) In: WhitefiesΒ  and whitefy-borne viruses in the tropics: Building a knowledge base for globalΒ  action. PK Anderson, FJ Morales, AL Jones and Markham RH (eds) ArteΒ  Libro Impresores, Cali Colombia pp. 24-25.Β Β 
  6. Dellaporta SL, Woods J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA mini preparation:Β  version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19-21.Β Β 
  7. Fargette D, Fauquet C, Grenier E, Thresh JM (1990) The spread of AfricanΒ  cassava mosaic virus into and within cassava felds. J Phytopathol 130: 289- 302.Β 
  8. Fauquet C, Fargette D (1990). African cassava mosaic virus: etiology,Β  epidemiology, and control. Plant Disease 74: 404-411.Β Β 
  9. Fondong VN, Pita JS, Rey MEC, Kochko Ade, Beachy RN, et al. (2000)Β  Evidence of synergism between African cassava mosaic virus and a newΒ  double-recombinant geminivirus infecting cassava in Cameroon. J Gen VirolΒ  81: 287-297.Β Β 
  10. Ghana Export Promotion Council (GEPA): https://www.gepaghana.org/ import/ghana-product/cassava-from-ghana/).Β 
  11. http://www.fao.org/3/x5032e/x5032e06.htm (accessed July 2020).Β 
  12. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), 1990. Cassava in TropicalΒ  Africa: A reference manual. Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 61-63.Β 
  13. Koros JC, Runo SM, Yusuf M, Orek CO (2018) Screening Selected CassavaΒ  Cultivars for Resistance against Cassava Viruses and Cassava Green MitesΒ  under Advanced Yield Trials in Kenya. IOSR J Biotechnol Biochem (IOSR JBB) 4: 37-52.Β Β 
  14. Legg JP, Owor B, Sseruwagi P, Ndunguru J (2006) Cassava mosaic virusΒ  disease in east and central Africa: epidemiology and management of aΒ  regional pandemic. Advances in Virus Research 67: 355-418.Β 
  15. Kemausuor F, Akowuah JO, Ofori E (2013) Assessment of Feedstock OptionsΒ  for Biofuels Production in Ghana. J Sustain Bioenergy Syst 3: 119-128.Β Β 
  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: MolecularΒ  Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. MolecularΒ  Biology and Evolution 35: 1547-1549.Β 
  17. Ntawuruhunga P, Okao-Okuja G, Bembe A, Obamb M, Armand Mvila JC, etΒ 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 8 of 9 β€’Β 

Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ  Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β 

  1. (2007) Incidence and severity of cassava mosaic disease in the RepublicΒ  of Congo. Afr Crop Sci J 15: 1-9.Β Β 
  2. Ogbe FO, Dixon AGO, Hughes J d’A, Alabi OJ, Okechukwu, R (2006) StatusΒ  of cassava begomo viruses and their new natural hosts in Nigeria. PlantΒ  Disease 90: 548-553.Β Β 
  3. Ogbe FO, Thottappilly G, Dixon AGO, Atiri GI, Mignouna HD (2003) VariantsΒ  of East African cassava mosaic virus and its distribution in double infectionsΒ  with African cassava mosaic virus in Nigeria. Plant Disease 87: 229-232.Β Β 
  4. Oteng-Frimpong R, Levy Y, Torkpo SK, Danquah EY, Offei SK, et al. (2012)Β  Complete Genome Sequencing of Two Causative Viruses of Cassava MosaicΒ  Disease in Ghana. Acta Virol 56: 305-314.Β Β 
  5. Owor B, Legg JP, Okao-Okuja G, Obonyo R, Ogenga-Latigo MW (2004) TheΒ  effect of cassava mosaic geminiviruses on symptom severity, growth andΒ  root yield of a cassava mosaic virus disease-susceptible cultivar in Uganda.Β  Annals of Applied Biology, 145: 331-337.Β 
  6. Page RD (1996) TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees onΒ  personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 357358.Β 
  7. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTALW: improving theΒ  sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequenceΒ  weighting, position- specifc gap penalties and weight matrix choice. NucleicΒ  Acids Res 22: 46734680.Β 
  8. Thresh JM, Cooter RJ (2005) Strategies for controlling cassava mosaic virusΒ  disease in Africa. Plant Pathology 54: 587-614.Β 
  9. TiendrΓ©bΓ©ogo F, Lefeuvre P, Hoareau M, Harimalala MA, De Bruyn A, et al.Β  (2012) Evolution of African cassava mosaic virus by recombination betweenΒ  bipartite and monopartite begomo viruses Virol J 9: 67.Β 
  10. Torkpo SK, Offei K, Danquah EY, Gafni Y (2017) Status of Cassava mosaicΒ  begomo viruses in farmers’ felds in Ghana. AIMS Agriculture and Food 2:Β  279-289.Β 
  11. Warburg O (1984) (Die kulturpfanzen usambaras) Mittcilungenaus denΒ  Deutschen Schutzgebieten 7: 131.Β 

Author AffliationsΒ Β 

1CSIR-Crops Research Institute, KumasiΒ 

2UniversitΓ© FΓ©lix HouphouΓ«t-Boigny Abidjan, CΓ΄te d’IvoireΒ 

3Biotechnology and Nuclear Agricultural Research Institute, Kwabenya, AccraΒ 

Volume 9 β€’ Issue 8 β€’ 1000258 β€’ Page 9 of 9 β€’ View publication stats