Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread
Oppong et al., J Plant Physiol Pathol 2021, 9:8Β
Journal of PlantΒ Β
Physiology & PathologyΒ
Research Article A SciTechnol JournalΒ
Cassava Mosaic Virus DiseaseΒ in Ghana: Distribution andΒ SpreadΒ
Allen Oppong1*. Ruth Naa A. Prempeh1, Linda AppianimaaΒ Abrokwah1, Esther Afoley Annang1, Esther Agyeman Marfo1,Β Zipporah Appiah Kubi1, Nana A. O. Danquah1, AugustineΒ Agyekum1, Benedicta Nsiah Frimpong1, Andrews SarkodieΒ Appiah3, Joseph N.L. Lamptey1, Moses Brandford Mochiah1,Β Justin S. Pita2Β
AbstractΒ
Cassava is an important staple crop in most of the tropics, includingΒ Ghana. The productivity of the crop is beset with pest and diseaseΒ attacks. With the emergence of virulent strains of the cassavaΒ mosaic virus (CMV), regular surveys are necessary to ascertain theΒ prevalence of CMV and their whitefy vectors in farmersβ felds toΒ help manage CMV disease affecting the crop. Field surveys wereΒ conducted in September and October of 2015 and December 2016Β to January 2017 using a harmonized sampling protocol developedΒ by the West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE) for root andΒ tuber projects. Three hundred and ninety-three felds were visitedΒ throughout Ghana and 11,760 cassava leaf samples examined.Β Whitefies were counted on 5 plants/feld. Diseased samples withΒ varying symptoms collected were assayed using PCR and genomicΒ sequencing. Cassava mosaic disease (CMD) symptoms wereΒ recorded in about ninety-six percent (96.4%) of felds surveyedΒ with varying severity. These symptoms included leaf mosaic, leafΒ distortion/twisting, malformation, fliform leaves, stunting andΒ chlorosis. Cultivars with red petiole colour were the most prevalentΒ while those with green petiole colour were the least. No whitefy wasΒ found on cultivars with purple and Green petioles while cultivarsΒ with reddish-green petioles had highest count of whitefies/plant.Β The Upper West and Upper East regions had the least amountΒ of whitefies/plant. The Ghanaian isolates clustered with the EastΒ African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus (EACMCV) isolates in aΒ cluster analysis. BLASTn analysis of 513 bp fragment of the DNA-B ofΒ Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 89.9% similarity with EACMCV Ghana isolates and 90.54% identity with the EACMCV-Ivory Coast.Β Similarly, the Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 95.8% nucleotideΒ sequence identity to the EACMCV-Ghana isolate and 94.22% toΒ the EACMV-Ivory Coast isolate. Nucleotide sequences of DNA-A ofΒ the Ghanaian isolates were less variable: between 95.90-96.73%Β when compared to already published sequences to a range of CMGΒ sequences available on the GenBank. The study has updated theΒ existing literature on CMD incidence which can contribute to theΒ development CMD-resistant cassava varieties in Ghana.Β Β
Keywords: Manihot esculenta; EACMV-Ivory coastΒ Β
*Corresponding author: Allen Oppong, CSIR-Crops Research Institute, Kumasi,Β E-mail: alnopp@yahoo.co.ukΒ Β
Received: June 29, 2021 Accepted: July 10, 2021 Published: July 17, 2021Β
IntroductionΒ
Cassava is the number one root and tuber crop in Ghana (FigureΒ 1). Te crop is cultivated predominantly in the southern and centralΒ parts of Ghana with signifcant production in the middle and northernΒ parts of the country. Te only areas of the country which do not haveΒ signifcant production of cassava are the Sudan savannah areas aroundΒ the Upper East and North East regions (Figure 1). Te estimated totalΒ land under cassava production is estimated around 900,000 hectares.Β In Ghana, over 70% of farmers engage in cassava production, and theΒ sector contributes about 22% of Agricultural GDP [1]. Ghana ranksΒ among the top fve cassava producers in Africa with an annual averageΒ production of sixteen million metric tons [1].Β
Its cultivation and associated businesses along the value chain isΒ a major source of employment for millions of the population. It isΒ a staple food crop in areas where it is cultivated and it is processedΒ into several industrial products such as cassava starch, cassava beer,Β spray starch, pharmaceutical raw material among several others [2].Β In recent times cassava has become an important crop to the socioΒ
cultural life and the economy of Ghana. However, the production ofΒ this crop faces several challenges. Tese include dependence on lowΒ yielding varieties, poor agronomic practices on the part of farmersΒ and incidence of pests and diseases [3]. Tere are several pests andΒ diseases that afect cassava production, but Cassava Mosaic DiseaseΒ (CMD) constitutes the most endemic disease of the crop in GhanaΒ [4]. Te disease can cause yield losses of over 90% depending on timeΒ of infection and the variety [5,6]. Te disease was frst reported in theΒ country a century ago by Warburg (1894) who described it as βleafΒ curlβ or βcrinkleβ illness aficting cassava plantsβ [7, 8]. Several strainsΒ of the cassava mosaic virus, the causal agent of CMD, have beenΒ reported in Ghana and in other parts of Africa and have been shownΒ to be responsible for severe yield losses [9-15].Β Β
To ascertain the current distribution of CMD and the strainΒ diversity of the virus in Ghana it is important that periodic surveysΒ and feld monitoring are conducted. Tis approach can help developΒ strategies which can curtail the potential damage that new and moreΒ virulent strains of the virus could cause to cassava production in theΒ country and beyond.Β Β
To this end, two nationwide surveys were conducted to provideΒ baseline data that can be used by breeders and other stakeholders,Β including modelers, to identify disease hotspot and cold spots forΒ breeding resistant varieties and the multiplication of disease-freeΒ planting materials for farmers. Additionally, this would provide dataΒ for predicting the rate of spread of cassava mosaic virus in Ghana andΒ West Africa.Β Β
Materials and MethodsΒ
Field surveyΒ
Surveys were conducted throughout the regions indicated inΒ (Figure 1). Tey were carried out in September and October of 2015Β and December 2016 to January 2017, using a harmonized samplingΒ protocol developed by the West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE)Β for root and tuber project head quartered at the University of FΓ©lixΒ HouphouΓ«t-Boigny, Abidjan, CΓ΄te dβIvoire. During each survey,Β
All articles published in Journal of Plant Physiology & Pathology are the property of SciTechnol, and is protected by copyrightΒ laws. Copyright Β© 2021, SciTechnol, All Rights Reserved. International Publisher of Science, Β
Technology and MedicineΒ
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
Figure 1: Map of Ghana showing regional boundaries and the agro-ecologies.
coordinates of felds visited were captured using a GPS device. TeΒ minimum distance between two felds where samples were collectedΒ was 10 km and in areas where cassava production was sparse,Β the distance between two felds varied depending on minimumΒ distances felds were encountered. In each feld transect walksΒ along two diagonals were made, and disease incidence and severityΒ were assessed on 15 plants within each transect. Tus, a total of 30Β plants were assessed in each feld for disease incidence and severity.Β Disease incidence was measured as a percentage of number of plantsΒ infected per feld based on the sampled plants while disease severityΒ was assessed based on a scale ranging from 1 to 5 as defned by theΒ International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Using thisΒ scale, 1 represents absence of infection; 2: mild infection; 3: moderateΒ infection; 4: severe infection and 5 represents very severe infectionΒ [16]. Data were collected via an electronic device programmed by theΒ University of Cambridge, UK. Te data were then uploaded into aΒ central repository at the University of Cambridge, UK for analysis.Β From each feld, leaf samples showing symptoms of cassava mosaicΒ virus infection were collected from among the top 5 leaves; these wereΒ kept in herbarium pressers and labeled. In addition, stem cuttingsΒ of infected plants were also collected and labeled. Te leaf samplesΒ were stored at the laboratory under ambient conditions while theΒ stem cuttings were maintained in insect proof screenhouse prior toΒ laboratory analysis. Whitefy Bemisia tabaci vectors were collectedΒ using an aspirator from 5 plants/feld and the total number countedΒ and recorded. Te whitefies were preserved in 70% ethanol, labeledΒ and stored at the laboratory in a freezer at 4Β°C. Te diversity of cassavaΒ genotypes encountered on the felds were diferentiated using the leafΒ petiole colour as most of the farm owners could not readily give theΒ names of the varieties they had planted.Β
Laboratory diagnosticsΒ Β
Genomic DNA was extracted from samples based on CetylΒ Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method [17].Β Β
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)Β
PCR was carried out in a 25 Β΅l reaction consisting of the followingΒ Β
reagents: PCR-grade water; 5 Β΅l of 5x standard bufer; 2.5 Β΅l 5%Β Tween-20; 0.25 Β΅l of 10 mM dNTPs; 0.25 Β΅l each of Forward andΒ Reverse primers; 5 U Taq polymerase and 5 Β΅l of DNA template.Β (Table 1) contains the list of primers used for the analysis andΒ detection of virus strains.Β
Termocycling conditionsΒ
Amplification conditions included a first PCR cycle comprisingΒ denaturation at 94Β°C for 5 min, annealing of primers at 52Β°C for 1Β min and elongation at 72Β°C for 2 min. Tis initial amplification cycleΒ was followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94Β°C, 1 min at 52Β°C and 2 min atΒ 72Β°C. At the end of the reaction, a final elongation step was achievedΒ at 72Β°C for 10 min and the reaction held at 4Β°C.Β Β
PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5%Β agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (1 lgβ10 ml) under a constantΒ current of 100 V. Visualization of the amplified bands under UV lightΒ was done using a Vilber Lourmat (InfnityTM) gel documentationΒ imaging system.Β
SequencingΒ
Where the expected bands on the agarose gel were not at exactlyΒ at the position according to the primer base pair, the recovered PCRΒ products were prepared for sequencing. Sequencing was carried outΒ by GENEWIZ, Inc (South Plainfeld, NJ) using Applied BiosystemsΒ Big Dye version 3.1. Te reactions were then run through an AppliedΒ Biosystem 3730xl DNA Analyzer for DNA sequencing.Β
Data analysisΒ
For our analysis, we made use of data-analysis sofware, namelyΒ a multi-dimensional data cube referred to, within the WAVEΒ programme as Scriptoria (2021); as the WAVE Cube. Tis toolΒ enabled us to interrogate and view our survey data from diferentΒ perspectives to present our extracted results as tables and graphics.Β
Sequence analysisΒ
Te sequence data was analysed by frst checking theΒ Β
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 2 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
Table 1: Primers used in this study to amplify DNA from cassava samples collected during disease survey.Β
| Primer NameΒ | Sequences (5β to 3β)Β | Virus SpeciesΒ | Product Size (bp) |
| JSP001F/Β
JSP002R |
ATGTCGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ
TGTTTATTAATTGCCAATACT |
ACMVΒ | Μ΄ 770 |
| JSP001FΒ | ATGTCGGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ | EACMVΒ | Μ΄ 770 |
| JSP003RΒ | CCTTTATTAATTTGTCACTGCΒ | EACMV | |
| CMBRep/FΒ | CRTCAATGACGTTGTACCAΒ | ACMVΒ | 368 |
| ACMVRep/RΒ | CAGCGGMAGTAAGTCMGAΒ | ACMV | |
| CMBCP/FΒ | GKCGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ | ACMVΒ | 650 |
| ACMVCP/RΒ | CCCTGYCTCCTGATGATTATAΒ | ACMV | |
| ACMV-AL1/FΒ | GCGGAATCCCTAACATTATCΒ | ACMVΒ | 1000 |
| ACMV-ARO/RΒ | GCTCGTATGTATCCTCTAAGGCCTGΒ | ACMV | |
| UV-AL1/F1Β | TGTCTTCTGGGACTTGTGTGΒ | EACMVΒ | 1600 |
| UV-AL1/R1Β | AACCTATCCCCGATGCTCATΒ | EACMV | |
| UV-AL1/F2Β | GTAATTGGGAAAGGGCCTCTΒ | EACMVΒ | 1000 |
| UV-CP/RΒ | GTTACGGAGCAACATGCAATΒ | EACMV | |
| UV-AL1/F1Β | TGTCTTCTGGGACTTGTGTGΒ | EACMV-UGΒ | 1600 |
| ACMV-CP/R3Β | TGCCTCCTGATGATTATATGTCΒ | EACMV-UG | |
| CMBCP/FΒ | GKCGAAGCGACCAGGAGATΒ | EACMV-UGΒ | 1000 |
| EACMV-UG/RΒ | CGCCTAAGCAAGGAATGGCGTΒ | EACMV-UG | |
| ACMVB1FΒ | TCGGGAGTGATACATGCGAAGGCΒ | ACMV | 628Β |
| ACMVB2RΒ | GGCTACACCAGCTACCTGAAGCTΒ | ACMV | |
| VNF031/FΒ | GGATACAGATAGGGTTCCCACΒ | EACMVΒ | β 560 |
| VNF032/RΒ | GACGAGGACAAGAATTCCAATΒ | EACMV | |
| EAB555/FΒ | TACATCGGCCTTTGAGTCGCATGGΒ | EACMVΒ | 544-560 |
| EAB555/RΒ | CTTATTAACGCCTATATAAACACCΒ | EACMV |
Β
chromatograms manually to avoid base miscalls and then trimmedΒ of low-quality sequences at the 5β² and 3β² ends. Te forward andΒ reverse sequences were compared to ensure complete homology.Β Te sequences were then edited, aligned and compared with otherΒ published isolates using Geneious 8.0 (Biomatters), ClustalW [18]Β BLAST [19]. Te nucleotide sequences derived from each of the CMGΒ isolates from Ghana were used in BLASTn analysis to ascertain theirΒ identity to the published isolates deposited at the NCBI database.Β Cluster dendrograms were generated with the Geneious Tree BuilderΒ using the Neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap support.Β
ResultsΒ
Field surveyΒ
Tree hundred and ninety-three (393) cassava farms wereΒ surveyed (215 in 2015 and 178 in 2016/17); in total 11,790 plants wereΒ examined across the country. Over ninety-six percent (96.44%) ofΒ all felds surveyed were diagnosed with CMD (Table 2) showing theΒ endemic nature of CMD in Ghana.Β Β
Northern region had the highest incidence of CMD followed byΒ Brong-Ahafo and the Upper West regions respectively (Figure 2)Β while Greater Accra had the highest CMD severity followed by UpperΒ West, Ashanti, Eastern, Western and then Brong-Ahafo regionsΒ (Figures 3-5).Β
CMD Symptoms regularly encountered include leaf mosaic,Β leaf distortion/twisting, malformation, fliform leaves and stuntingΒ (Figure 6).Β
Fields with 50% to 75% disease incidence had the highest numberΒ of whitefy populations while those with disease incidence greaterΒ than 75% had the least whitefy population (Figure 7). Ashanti regionΒ had the highest whitefy population/plant followed by Central and theΒ Β
Table 2: Percentage of cassava felds showing CMD-infected and non-infected.Β
| Year of SurveyΒ | CMD-Infected Fields %Β | Healthy Fields % |
| 2015 (Year 1)Β | 95.35%Β | 4.65% |
| 2016/17 (Year 2)Β | 97.75%Β | 2.25% |
| Grand TotalΒ | 96.44%Β | 3.56% |
Table 3: Mean Whitefy population count per plant across the regions during theΒ 2-year survey period.
| RegionΒ | Whitefy – Mean population/plant |
| AshantiΒ | 2.11 |
| Brong-AhafoΒ | 0.85 |
| CentralΒ | 1.38 |
| EasternΒ | 0.85 |
| Greater AccraΒ | 0.72 |
| NorthernΒ | 0.12 |
| Upper EastΒ | 0.05 |
| Upper WestΒ | 0.07 |
| VoltaΒ | 0.75 |
| WesternΒ | 1.66 |
| MeanΒ | 1.03 |
Western regions respectively (Table 3).Β
Dominant varieties encountered were cultivars with red petiolesΒ followed by those with yellowish green petiole (Table 4 and Figure 6).Β However, farmers could not identify the varieties by their actual namesΒ and most of them classifed the plants as local varieties. Varieties withΒ yellowish green petioles had the highest disease severity, followedΒ by varieties with red petioles while plants with yellowish greenΒ petioles with pinkish colouration had the lowest severity (Table 4).Β No whitefies were collected on plants with purple and green petiolesΒ encountered during the feld surveys (Table 4).Β
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 3 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
Laboratory diagnosticsΒ
Figure 2: Percentage mean incidence of CMD across the regions surveyed in 2015 and 2016/17.Β
Figure 3: Mean severity of CMD disease across the regions during the 2015 and 2016/17 surveys.Β
Figure 4: Map showing the incidence (A) and severity (B) of CMD in Ghana for 2015.
sequences available on the NCBI. Te Ghanaian isolates clusteredΒ Β
Afer trimming, sequences of 513 nt of CMG DNA-B of theΒ Ghanaian isolates were compared to a range of CMG DNA-BΒ Β
with full genomes of the East African cassava mosaic CameroonΒ virus (EACMCV) isolates as indicated in the cluster dendrogramΒ illustrated in (Figures 8 and 9) indicating the sequenced nucleotidesΒ Β
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 4 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
Figure 5: Map showing CMD severity (A) and incidence (B) of areas surveyed in 2016/17.Β
Figure 6: CMD symptoms on infected plants encountered during the survey. The arrows point to A: Leaf mosaic/distortion, B:Β Filiforms and C: Stunting/leaf mosaic/distortion and some of leaf petiole colours observed.Β
Figure 7: Mean CMD percentage incidence and mean whitefy number in felds surveyed over the two-year period.Β
from our samples although complete shared close resemblance.Β BLASTn analysis of 513 bp fragment of the DNA-B of GhanaianΒ isolate GH07216 showed 89.9% similarity with EACMCV-GhanaΒ isolate (Accession no, JN165087.1) and 90.54% identity with theΒ EACMCV-Ivory Coast (Accession no, AF259897.1) (Figure 8).Β Β
Similarly, Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 95.8% nucleotideΒ sequence identity to the EACMCV-Ghana isolate and 94.22% to theΒ Ivory Coast isolate. Nucleotide sequences of DNA-A of the GhanaianΒ isolates were less variable when compared to already publishedΒ sequences available on the GenBank. BLAST analysis of a 747 bpΒ
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 5 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
Table 4: Cultivar petiole colour, CMD severity and whitefy population count per plant observed during the survey period.Β
| Cultivar type (Petiole colour)Β | No. of samplesΒ | CMD Severity MeanΒ | Whitefy countΒ | Whitefy count/plant |
| Reddish greenΒ | 30Β | 2.67Β | 29.00 (0.5392)Β | 0.86 |
| Pinkish petioleΒ | 330Β | 2.82Β | 15.00 (0.0084)Β | 0.04 |
| Purple petioleΒ | 30Β | 2.33Β | 0.00 (0.0000)Β | 0 |
| Red petioleΒ | 8,250Β | 2.98Β | 1,974.00 (0.0398)Β | 0.34 |
| Yellowish green petioleΒ | 3,030Β | 2.99Β | 729.00 (0.0523)Β | 0.24 |
| Greenish red PetioleΒ | 30Β | 2.00Β | 6.00 (0.1390)Β | 0.2 |
| Green petioleΒ | 60Β | 2.78Β | 0.00 (0.0000)Β | 0 |
| TotalΒ | 11,760Β | 2.98Β | 2,753.00 (0.0266) | |
| *Numbers in brackets are standard error of mean (SEM) values | ||||
Figure 8: Dendrogram showing clustering of samples with similar DNA-A nucleotide patterns, this clustering was producedΒ using Geneious Tree Builder using the Neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap support. The Ghanaian isolate clusteredΒ together with 84.4% similarity to ACMV isolates including ACMV KE and ACMV Ghana isolates.
fragment of isolate Gh14916 revealed nucleotide sequence identity ofΒ between 95.90-96.73 % to a range of CMG sequences available on theΒ GenBank (Figure 9).Β
DiscussionΒ
Te fndings of this survey on the incidence and spread of CMDΒ are similar to those reported by [20,21] although their surveys wereΒ limited to certain parts of Ghana. Te inclusion of the northern partsΒ of the country in our current surveys is relevant. Similar surveys doneΒ in the past have ofen focused mainly on the southern parts [21]. In theΒ most recent survey of the country carried out by [21] in 2007 and 2008,Β they reported the widespread incidence of CMD in mainly southernΒ and central parts of Ghana and they surveyed only 136 farmersβ felds,Β but our work has gone beyond these geographical areas and numbers.Β Β
Te current study represents a large increase in the number of feldsΒ surveyed in recent times and gives a better picture of the extent ofΒ spread of CMD in Ghana. Tis result also gives indication as to theΒ levels of productivity lost by farmers, assuming a 10% yield reductionΒ to CMD infection on farmer felds. Tis fnding requires that urgentΒ steps be taken to fnd a robust remedy to reduce the incidence ofΒ CMD in farmersβ felds to improve cassava productivity and ensureΒ food security because cassava alone contributes about 22% of GhanaβsΒ agricultural GDP.Β
Te CMD symptoms observed is consistent with CMD symptomsΒ reported by several authors including all [20-22].Β Β
Te low incidence of whitefies on plants showing very highΒ incidence of CMD (75% to 100%) suggests that the highly infectedΒ Β
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 6 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
Figure 9: Dendrogram showing clustering of samples with similar DNA-B nucleotide patterns. this clustering was producedΒ using Geneious Tree Builder using the Neighbour-joining method with 1000 bootstrap support Four of the Ghanaian isolatesΒ clustered with EACMVCV-Ivory Coast isolate and others
felds become unattractive to the insects and therefore the insectsΒ move on to felds that are fresher and healthier or possibly youngerΒ [23]. Te studies by them [24] have reported that the diseaseΒ incidence on felds planted with infected cuttings and the relativeΒ abundance of whitefies contribute diferently to the incidence of theΒ disease. Analysis of symptoms observed on infected plants and feldsΒ during our survey indicated that infections could be from infectedΒ cuttings used as planting materials as well as from whitefies. TeseΒ two sources have been established as key sources of infections and itΒ is believed that both infected cuttings and whitefies afected diseaseΒ incidence and severity in the felds surveyed [25].Β Β
Generally, the whitefy populations encountered in the feldsΒ were low and varied among the regions; this is similar to fndingsΒ by [26] in Congo Brazzaville and [27] in Ghana. Te northernΒ parts of Ghana which have a savannah agro-ecology with unimodalΒ rainfall had the lowest incidence of whitefies which is similar toΒ observations reported. Te northern parts of Ghana can be proposedΒ for the establishment and maintenance of clean planting materialsΒ production felds. Tis is because with low incidence of whitefies itΒ is expected that felds planted with disease-free cuttings can maintainΒ their health status for some time before they become infected.Β
Laboratory diagnosticsΒ
Te detection of various strains of ACMV and EACMCV isolatesΒ based on the analysis of CMV DNA-A and DNA-B nucleotides showsΒ the widespread nature of CMVs in Ghana. Previous reports hadΒ detected ACMV-Ghana isolate and EACMV-Cameroun and others.Β Β
However, the detection of ACMV isolate with 84.4% similarity toΒ ACMV-Kenya isolate and EACMVCV Ivory Coast isolate in theΒ present study for instance is a clear indication that more strains ofΒ CMV could be present already in Ghana or new strains of CMVΒ could be entering the country. It is therefore important that regularΒ monitoring and surveillance are conducted to identify any potentialΒ new strains to assist the management of CMD, including breedingΒ for robust CMV-resistant cultivars thereby improving cassavaΒ productivity. Te possible detection of new strains from regularΒ monitoring and surveillance can also help modelers to predict theΒ spread of new strains of CMV and other cassava viruses in the countryΒ and possibly in the West African sub region.Β
ConclusionΒ
While this study has not included a study of the evolutionaryΒ aspects of any of the cassava viruses, it has shown an increase fromΒ previous surveys in the number of viruses detected in Ghana. InΒ particular, the presence of ACMV-Kenya and EACMV-Ivory CoastΒ had not been evident previously in Ghana this is therefore a newΒ fnding for this country.Β
Te study has shown the spread and distribution of CMD inΒ Ghana. Disease symptoms regularly encountered in farmers feldΒ included leaf mosaic, leaf distortion/twisting, malformation, fliformΒ leaves, stunting and chlorosis. Cultivars with red petiole colourΒ were the most prevalent while those with green petiole colour wereΒ the least. No whitefy was found on cultivars with purple and greenΒ petioles while cultivars with reddish-green petioles had highest countΒ Β
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 7 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
of whitefies/plant. Te Upper West and Upper East regions hadΒ the least number of whitefies/plant and could be good locations forΒ healthy planting material production. Te Ghanaian isolates clusteredΒ with the East African Cassava Mosaic Cameroon Virus (EACMCV)Β isolates. BLAST analysis of 513 bp fragment of the DNA-B ofΒ Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 89.9% similarity with EACMCVΒ
Ghana isolates and 90.54% identity with the EACMCV-Ivory Coast.Β Similarly, Ghanaian isolate GH07216 showed 95.8% nucleotideΒ sequence identity to the EACMCV-Ghana isolate and 94.22% to theΒ Ivory Coast isolate. Nucleotide sequences of DNA-A of the GhanaianΒ isolates were less variable; between 95.90 – 96.73 % when compared toΒ already published sequences to a range of CMG sequences availableΒ on the GenBank. Locations with high CMD incidence and severityΒ were identifed which are good and can be proposed for breedingΒ of CMD resistant cassava cultivars in the country. Te informationΒ contained in this paper will provide a useful guide for Scientists andΒ other researchers and Extension worker engaged in cassava researchΒ and improvement of farmer productivity. Using the methodologyΒ shown in this study, we conclude that the possible detection of newΒ strains from regular monitoring and surveillance could help modelersΒ to predict entrance of new strains of CMV and other cassava virusesΒ in the country and possibly in the West African sub region.Β
Declaration SectionΒ
Ethics approval and consent to participateΒ
Not applicableΒ
Consent of PublicationΒ
Not applicableΒ
Availability of Data and MaterialΒ
Field and laboratory data are stored at the repository of ScriptoriaΒ Agshare,Today, UK and is readily available to interested parties.Β Β
Competing InterestsΒ
Te authors declare that βthey have no competing interestsβ. FundingΒ
Tis work was funded by the Gates Foundation and UKΒ Department for International Development (DFID) throughΒ University of FΓ©lix HouphouΓ«t-Boigny and the WAVE projectΒ (OPP1082413).Β
Authorβs ContributionsΒ
Allen Oppong: Lead investigator and lead author of this article.Β
Ruth N.A Prempeh, Linda A. Abrokwah, Supported data entry,Β laboratory analysis and writing of article.Β
Esther Afoley Annang, Esther Agyeman Marfo, Zipporah AppiahΒ Kubi, Supported laboratory analysis and proof reading of article.Β
Nana A.O. Danquah Supported in laboratory analysis. Augustine Agyekum Assisted in feld survey and collection of data. Andrews Sarkodie Appiah Assisted in phylogenetic analysis.Β
Benedicta Nsiah Frimpong, Joseph N.L. Lamptey, MosesΒ Brandford Mochiah, Assisted in manuscript review.Β
Justin S. Pita Conceptualization of project idea and mainΒ recipient of project grant; review of manuscript.Β
AcknowledgementΒ
The authors are very grateful frstly to the Gates Foundation and UKΒ Department for International Development (DFID) through University of FΓ©lixΒ HouphouΓ«t-Boigny and the WAVE project (OPP1082413) for providing funds forΒ this work. The authors are also grateful to the various Agric Extension OffcersΒ who assisted during the feld surveys. The drivers, Technicians and staff of CSIRΒ
Crops Research Institute who played various roles during the survey are deeplyΒ appreciated. Finally, we thank the Scriptoria AgShare. Today programme and theΒ University of Cambridge, UK for the editorial and technical support respectively.Β
βThis work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda GatesΒ Foundation [OPP1082413]. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, aΒ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assignedΒ to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.βΒ
ReferencesΒ
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipmon DJ (1990) Basic localΒ alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.Β
- Bisimwa E, Walangululu J, Bragard C (2015) Cassava Mosaic Disease YieldΒ Loss Assessment under Various Altitude Agroecosystems in the SudKivuΒ Region, Democratic Republic of Congo. Tropicultura 33: 101110.Β
- Bock KR (1983) Epidemiology of cassava mosaic disease in Kenya. In:Β Plumb RT, Thresh JM, ed. Plant Virus Epidemiology. The Spread andΒ Control of Insect-borne Viruses. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell ScientifcΒ Publications, 337-347.Β
- Bull SE, Briddon RW, Sserubombwe WS, Ngugi K, Markham PG, et al.Β (2006) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of cassava mosaic viruses inΒ Kenya. J Gen Virol 87: 3053-3065.Β
- Cudjoe A, Gyamenah J, Braima J (2005) Chapter 1.2 (Ghana) In: WhitefiesΒ and whitefy-borne viruses in the tropics: Building a knowledge base for globalΒ action. PK Anderson, FJ Morales, AL Jones and Markham RH (eds) ArteΒ Libro Impresores, Cali Colombia pp. 24-25.Β Β
- Dellaporta SL, Woods J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA mini preparation:Β version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19-21.Β Β
- Fargette D, Fauquet C, Grenier E, Thresh JM (1990) The spread of AfricanΒ cassava mosaic virus into and within cassava felds. J Phytopathol 130: 289- 302.Β
- Fauquet C, Fargette D (1990). African cassava mosaic virus: etiology,Β epidemiology, and control. Plant Disease 74: 404-411.Β Β
- Fondong VN, Pita JS, Rey MEC, Kochko Ade, Beachy RN, et al. (2000)Β Evidence of synergism between African cassava mosaic virus and a newΒ double-recombinant geminivirus infecting cassava in Cameroon. J Gen VirolΒ 81: 287-297.Β Β
- Ghana Export Promotion Council (GEPA): https://www.gepaghana.org/ import/ghana-product/cassava-from-ghana/).Β
- http://www.fao.org/3/x5032e/x5032e06.htm (accessed July 2020).Β
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), 1990. Cassava in TropicalΒ Africa: A reference manual. Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 61-63.Β
- Koros JC, Runo SM, Yusuf M, Orek CO (2018) Screening Selected CassavaΒ Cultivars for Resistance against Cassava Viruses and Cassava Green MitesΒ under Advanced Yield Trials in Kenya. IOSR J Biotechnol Biochem (IOSR JBB) 4: 37-52.Β Β
- Legg JP, Owor B, Sseruwagi P, Ndunguru J (2006) Cassava mosaic virusΒ disease in east and central Africa: epidemiology and management of aΒ regional pandemic. Advances in Virus Research 67: 355-418.Β
- Kemausuor F, Akowuah JO, Ofori E (2013) Assessment of Feedstock OptionsΒ for Biofuels Production in Ghana. J Sustain Bioenergy Syst 3: 119-128.Β Β
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: MolecularΒ Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. MolecularΒ Biology and Evolution 35: 1547-1549.Β
- Ntawuruhunga P, Okao-Okuja G, Bembe A, Obamb M, Armand Mvila JC, etΒ
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 8 of 9 β’Β
Citation: Oppong A, Prempeh RNA, Abrokwah LA, Annang EA, Marfo EA, et al. (2021) Cassava Mosaic Virus Disease in Ghana: Distribution and Spread. JΒ Plant Physiol Pathol 9:8. 258.Β
- (2007) Incidence and severity of cassava mosaic disease in the RepublicΒ of Congo. Afr Crop Sci J 15: 1-9.Β Β
- Ogbe FO, Dixon AGO, Hughes J dβA, Alabi OJ, Okechukwu, R (2006) StatusΒ of cassava begomo viruses and their new natural hosts in Nigeria. PlantΒ Disease 90: 548-553.Β Β
- Ogbe FO, Thottappilly G, Dixon AGO, Atiri GI, Mignouna HD (2003) VariantsΒ of East African cassava mosaic virus and its distribution in double infectionsΒ with African cassava mosaic virus in Nigeria. Plant Disease 87: 229-232.Β Β
- Oteng-Frimpong R, Levy Y, Torkpo SK, Danquah EY, Offei SK, et al. (2012)Β Complete Genome Sequencing of Two Causative Viruses of Cassava MosaicΒ Disease in Ghana. Acta Virol 56: 305-314.Β Β
- Owor B, Legg JP, Okao-Okuja G, Obonyo R, Ogenga-Latigo MW (2004) TheΒ effect of cassava mosaic geminiviruses on symptom severity, growth andΒ root yield of a cassava mosaic virus disease-susceptible cultivar in Uganda.Β Annals of Applied Biology, 145: 331-337.Β
- Page RD (1996) TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees onΒ personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 357–358.Β
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTALW: improving theΒ sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequenceΒ weighting, position- specifc gap penalties and weight matrix choice. NucleicΒ Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.Β
- Thresh JM, Cooter RJ (2005) Strategies for controlling cassava mosaic virusΒ disease in Africa. Plant Pathology 54: 587-614.Β
- TiendrΓ©bΓ©ogo F, Lefeuvre P, Hoareau M, Harimalala MA, De Bruyn A, et al.Β (2012) Evolution of African cassava mosaic virus by recombination betweenΒ bipartite and monopartite begomo viruses Virol J 9: 67.Β
- Torkpo SK, Offei K, Danquah EY, Gafni Y (2017) Status of Cassava mosaicΒ begomo viruses in farmersβ felds in Ghana. AIMS Agriculture and Food 2:Β 279-289.Β
- Warburg O (1984) (Die kulturpfanzen usambaras) Mittcilungenaus denΒ Deutschen Schutzgebieten 7: 131.Β
Author AffliationsΒ Β
1CSIR-Crops Research Institute, KumasiΒ
2UniversitΓ© FΓ©lix HouphouΓ«t-Boigny Abidjan, CΓ΄te dβIvoireΒ
3Biotechnology and Nuclear Agricultural Research Institute, Kwabenya, AccraΒ
Volume 9 β’ Issue 8 β’ 1000258 β’ Page 9 of 9 β’ View publication stats








